User talk:193.242.192.9

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 193.242.192.9). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.

When you edit pages:


 * Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
 * Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
 * Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type   in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. Antonrojo 16:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Warnings
Thanks for experimenting with the page Tibet on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Nlu 08:13, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Antonrojo 16:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

VAndal!
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.

Tadija (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Geronimo20 (talk) 18:45, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Underwater Cultural Heritage
Thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia. However, when external links are added to an article, it is for the purpose of providing the reader with a link to material that could not be incorporated into the article, for copyright or similar reasons. Although the Underwater Cultural Heritage site is a useful resource that could be used as a reference in articles relating to underwater archaeology and similar, it is not appropriate to add the same link to so many articles, particularly where its relevance could be tangential, at best. The impression is that this looks like spamming, even if it is for a good cause. I've removed a number of the additions you've made and moved a couple from the See also sections to the External links, where they may be relevant. Please stop now, and consider the advice in the two links I've provided. --RexxS (talk) 14:17, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

I've now looked carefully at the articles you've added the external link to. Having seen that Wikipedia has an article on UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, I would advise you that none of the external links you've added could be considered appropriate. In articles where the Convention is relevant, it should only be necessary to make an internal link to the Wikipedia article in the See also section. You may wish to update the External links section of UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage to reflect the external link you have been adding. --RexxS (talk) 14:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Along with most other editors, I deeply appreciate the work done by UNESCO (to which your IP suggests you belong), and would encourage you to continue to contribute to Wikipedia. In addition to our guidelines on external links and spam, I would recommend you also examine our conflict-of-interest guidelines and Advice for the cultural sector. Please don't be discouraged if your efforts are modified or removed; Wikipedia editors have particular ways of organising our content, and it is inevitable that new editors will unknowingly fail to conform with what is expected here. There is a learning curve associated with editing Wikipedia, but anyone asking for help is likely to find plenty of assistance freely available. I don't know if English is your first language, but there are many editors who have sufficient ability in the common EU languages to deal with any language barriers. Hope that helps. --RexxS (talk) 15:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Capacity Development for Education for All (CapEFA) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/pages/Capacity-Development-for-Education-for-All-CapEFA/163784627001201?v=wall/. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

September 2012
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Education for All Global Monitoring Report, because to me it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Your edit here to Education for All Global Monitoring Report was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/user/efareport/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) COI
Hello,. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest including WP:NOPAY.
 * http://.unesco.org

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People with a close connection to a subject need to be aware of Wikipedia's policies;


 * Advertisements masquerading as articles
 * Conflict of interest
 * Paid advocacy, public relations, and marketing
 * Advertising and conflicts of interest (External Linking)
 * Editors who have a conflict of interest
 * Accounts used for promotion
 * Law Of Unintended Consequences
 * Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. You may also wish to avoid giving the impression that your account is to be used for promotional purposes. Regardless, doing so does not exempt you from compliance with Wikipedias policies. --Hu12 (talk) 21:00, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Creative Cities Network


A tag has been placed on Creative Cities Network requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from Creative Cities Network. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Vandalism to Magic Circle (law firms)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.69.115.5 (talk) 22:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Education for All Global Monitoring Report have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Education for All Global Monitoring Report was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/GEMReport) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:57, 25 July 2018 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Draft:International Music Day concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:International Music Day, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:International Music Day


Hello, 193.242.192.9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "International Music Day".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:47, 24 July 2020 (UTC)