User talk:193.65.1.44

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Heimstern Läufer 07:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, welcome, and I hope that you will like Wikipedia. --Bruin_rrss23 (talk) 08:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sjakkalle (Check!)  12:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Pop music, you will be blocked from editing.  Leafy plant  12:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Pop music (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 12:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

This is a computer in a public library.193.65.1.44 13:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

Army
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Anthony Rupert 13:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Gwernol 11:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC) Gwernol 11:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Public computer
This is a tampere's citylibrary's public computer that anybody can use who is over 18. Or maybe all the computers have same "IP adress", I don't know. I am not vandalize the wikipedia. But maybe would be good to block this because it uses many people who maybe vandalize.193.65.1.44 14:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. eskimospy ( talk  &bull;  contribs  &bull; count) 07:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Pispala (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 12:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pispala, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pispala was changed by 193.65.1.44 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-08-21T02:05:17+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 06:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete information on pages without first discussing it on the talk page. It is not constructive and is considered vandalism. Thank you. Lenore Schwartz 06:10, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I see you're adding alot of finnish article or translation links to articles. If you were attempting to help translate Pispala then please make sure you do not delete or blank the page. Thank you. Lenore Schwartz 06:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

A note re: Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review
Please be advised that I have recently conducted a review of the Rorschach test (formerly Rorschach inkblot test) talk page and archives. At some point, you have commented on the issue of the display and/or placement of the Rorschach inkblot image. Based on my understanding of your comment(s), I have placed you into one of three categories. I am issuing this note so that you can review how I have placed you, and to signal if this is an appropriate placement and/or to make known your current thoughts on this matter. You may either participate in discussion at the article talk page or leave a note at my talk page; but to keep things in one place, you should also clarify at Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review/addendum. Longer statements may be made here or quick clarifications/affirmations based on several pre-written statements can be made here. Best regards, –xenotalk 14:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Further to the above, we would appreciate if you could briefly take the time to place yourself below one of the suggested statements here. If none of these statements represents your current position, please compose your own or simply sign "Not applicable" under "Other quick clarifications". Likewise sign as N/A if you do not want to participate further in this debate. If you choose not to respond then you will likely not be counted with respect to further consensus-determining efforts. –xenotalk 14:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wholphin, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 13:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Nomination of Massaccesi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Massaccesi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Massaccesi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cupper52 (talk) 10:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maxx Klaxon


The article Maxx Klaxon has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:MUSICBIO"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KH-1 (talk) 02:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cheap Records


The article Cheap Records has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced and lacking in WP:SIGCOV."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen Folf  (talk)  05:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)