User talk:193.92.5.31

November 2022
Hello 193.92.5.31. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to AXELOS, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:193.92.5.31. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ''(You would need to create a user account first, before taking the steps provided here. Paid editing by IP users is not permitted under any circumstances.) If I have misinterpreted — if the user editing from this IP address has no conflict-of-interest ties to AXELOS/PeopleSoft, and the edits were merely the result of inexperienced editing — that is ultimately immaterial. The edits were removed because of their content, not because they may have been made by an employee/agent of the subject(s). Even if they were made independently and in good faith, they violated central Wikipedia tenets like neutrality, as well as the manual of style. No further editing should be done without first self-educating on Wikipedia's policies and practices.'' FeRDNYC (talk) 15:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)