User talk:194.169.1.99

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. - Kingpin13 (talk) 10:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from London Stock Exchange. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --me_and (talk) 12:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Howard University, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Howard University was changed by 194.169.1.99 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-09-26T16:46:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:46, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2011
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Hamster. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. L.tak (talk) 15:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

June 2015
Hello, I'm Rodw. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Michael Eavis because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash; Rod talk 13:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016
Hello, I'm Marianna251. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Postal codes in Canada has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marianna251TALK 15:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Postal codes in Canada, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Isit2004 (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2017
Hello, I'm Rollingcontributor. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kelly (given name), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RoCo (talk) 14:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Halil Kut, this IP will be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit? 01:29, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Football Lads Alliance. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 09:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If your IP is really based at the London Stock Exchange as it appears your edits are rather a discredit to the organisation. AusLondonder (talk) 09:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that in this edit to Ottoman Empire, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 14:27, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fall of Constantinople, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. &mdash; fortuna  velut luna  14:40, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2018
Hello, I'm Home Lander. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Old Colfeians— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 15:42, 16 October 2018 (UTC)