User talk:194.176.105.133

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Bitter (beer) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Javier MC  18:01, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Glycated hemoglobin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CliffC (talk) 00:21, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chuck Thomas (television presenter). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 12:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stockholm syndrome, you may be blocked from editing. CliffC (talk) 14:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2012
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Whistleblower ‎, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jade McSorley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. noq (talk) 17:58, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, I'm Pinethicket. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Scotch egg because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Pinethicket (talk) 07:34, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Ginger Man with this edit. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:33, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

June 2013
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:21, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Scott Hogan because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 09:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neue Deutsche Härte, you may be blocked from editing. —  Richard  BB  13:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rickie Lambert, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Roy Hodgson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014
Hello, I'm Velella. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dagenham seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:43, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
I notice you added a citation needed template to the article's lead, which I've just reverted. As this has been done a couple of times now, I feel I should mention that the lead of an article is usually a summary of the page as a whole, and as a result any information included there should be covered in greater detail later on, so citations are generally not needed. An exception to this rule might be if the information was particularly controversial, but I don't think criticism of how a politician handles television appearances falls into that. For what it's worth, the information you are looking for appears in the "Media image" section, where it is sourced from reliable publications. Hope this helps, and please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions. Thank you, This is Paul (talk) 12:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Derby County F.C.— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Derby County F.C. with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Occupational safety and health article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --allthefoxes (Talk) 15:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Thanks for your edits to Jarrow and linking in the Codex. I've changed a couple of internal links from formal references to Wikilinks and expanded one that had been copied over. Just minor technical points though. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 11:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 13:54, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Katietalk 14:00, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Radja Nainggolan, you may be blocked from editing. Bronze 2018 ( talk ) 15:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Callum O'Dowda. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Rob 13 Talk 23:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Callum O'Dowda, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Rob 13 Talk 23:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit you recently made to Supernormal seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, I'm Vermont. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ian Beale— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  Vermont &#124; reply here  18:04, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Subway Challenge— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. MBlaze Lightning 11:37, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Subway Challenge. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. epicgenius (talk) 11:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits to Talk:Subway Challenge could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. epicgenius (talk) 11:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

look editors i dont want scource 12 to be associated with my name its an illegal sscource if u do not change the wording i do not my name andi james to be associated with learning a challenge from wikipedia i did not! you cannot quote my name from an illegal scource simple as its in your guidelines i obey by your guidelines your editors do not change the wording! or delete the scource your choice to comply with your guidelines im only quoting ur scources and guidelines if u continue to persist then legal action i willtake ah thats against your guidelines which im following ur editors are not!

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 11:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Right, firstly calm down and take a breath. If you carry on saying "f*** this, f*** that, f*** everyone" your talk page will be turned off and you will be SOL. If you continue assert legal action, you won't get unblocked. If you switch to another IP, you'll be considered a sockpuppet and blocked again, for longer. So it really is in your best interests to chill.

Source #12 is this International Business Times citation. It names Glen Bryant, but nobody else. So I will remove the other names in order to protect their privacy and uphold the biography of living persons policy. I am concerned that the IBT source itself refers to the Daily Mail, which is generally banned on Wikipedia. Hopefully that's what you were trying to do, and resolves the issue. If it does, great, we'll draw a line under this and move on. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  12:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)