User talk:194.228.32.179

June 2018
Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Human sexual activity. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;  Discuss  09:06, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * So you have an editor mafia?

194.228.32.179 (talk) 09:31, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Human sexual activity, you may be blocked from editing. Tomybrz  Bip Bip  09:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * It is a wikipedia violation to assume bad faith and immediately accuse someone of vandalism. The edits were justified.  As written, the passage placed undue weight on an obscure opinion encouraging sexualisation of minors.  It's interested that there is a mafia of editors who act immediately to protect this.

194.228.32.179 (talk) 09:31, 22 June 2018 (UTC)