User talk:194.60.38.198

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Chris Kelly (British politician) with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chris_Kelly_(British_politician)&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zad68 (talk) 18:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Kelly (British politician) with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Zad68 (talk) 18:56, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Kelly (British politician) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Zad68 (talk) 19:01, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Kelly (British politician), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your account will be submitted for Administrator attention. Zad68 (talk) 16:03, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

AN/I
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Zad68 (talk) 16:57, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Your addition to Judith Jolly, Baroness Jolly has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. (Non-neutral) content copied from http://www.rcgp.org.uk/pdf/Tamar%20News%20October%202011.pdf Drmies (talk) 19:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Kelly (British politician), you may be blocked from editing. Zad68 (talk) 14:34, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Note from an admin: I agree, and I will up the ante--consider this a final warning. Removal of sourced content and whitewashing a political biography will result in a block. Moreover, there is a distinct non-neutral flavour to edits by this IP to articles such as Stephen Barclay; such POV editing may also lead to a block. Drmies (talk) 15:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chief Whip, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=499596689 here]. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 12:46, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pakistan Peoples Party with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Adjkasi (discuss me | changes) 12:55, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Transport in Birmingham. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. WillDow (Talk) 13:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Drayton Park railway station do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Your edit here to Drayton Park railway station was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.flickr.com/photos/train-pix/5927364757/in/photostream) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:43, 17 July 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

October 2012
Hello, I'm Road Wizard. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Tim Razzall, Baron Razzall without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Road Wizard (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Heaton-Harris, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Wavehunter (talk) 17:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, I'm Dolescum. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Caroline Dinenage without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dolescum (talk) 17:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Caroline Dinenage, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dolescum (talk) 17:09, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Denisarona. Your recent edit to the page London Charterhouse appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:47, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Conservative Friends of Gibraltar, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —    Bill W.     (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 14:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013
Please see Talk:Mark_Pritchard_(politician). There may be a conflict of interest.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 07:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm Planet Herald. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Chris Bryant without thoroughly explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Herald talk with me 14:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Chris Bryant, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Herald talk with me 14:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

✅One user of this IP address attempted to expand List of choir schools. It was a good effort to expand and update, but unfortunately made many errors in the Wiki markup. I have been through and corrected them, and generally weeded out a few inappropriate entries. I would strongly suggest that whoever did this registers as a editor so that more experienced editors can advise and assist future endeavours. Thanks for a good effort. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 12:24, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Simon Curtis


The article Simon Curtis has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * does not appear to meet notability guidelines; no references from reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Deb (talk) 13:28, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm Epicgenius. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Epicgenius (talk) 19:26, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.