User talk:194.60.38.227/Archive 1

July 2017
Hello, I'm Drchriswilliams. I noticed that you recently removed content from Damien Moore without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Drchriswilliams (talk) 11:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Damien Moore, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Drchriswilliams (talk) 12:23, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Damien Moore, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Drchriswilliams (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi there, I work for Damien Moore, Member of Parliament for Southport. The statement 'Damien Moore is openly gay' is not true. If you continue to put this statement on Mr Moore's page it is tantamount to a libellous act. If you would to discuss the matter, please contact the office of Damien Moore MP on 0207 219 1162. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.60.38.227 (talk)


 * If you work for Mr Moore, then you have a conflict of interest and should refrain from directly editing his page. You may request edits at Talk:Damien Moore. Further, if you are directly compensated for editing Mr Moore's article, then you are a paid editor and must make certain additional disclosures about your status. —C.Fred (talk) 14:54, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

This is complete nonsense. Surely Mr Moore knows better than anyone if he is openly gay - I spoke to him myself and I can assure you he is not. The 'pink news' source is wholly inaccurate and the Southport visitor article does not state that he is openly gay. Why are you persisting with this?!


 * Unfortunately, first-hand accounts and original research are not deemed reliable sources for an article. Publications in the media generally are—and when an assertion is reported independently by multiple sources, Wikipedia views that as satisfaction of the verifiability policy. I know it's hard to prove a negative assertion, but if you can find media coverage that asserts Moore is not gay (or at least not openly gay), that would act as a counterweight to the sources we already have. —C.Fred (talk) 15:23, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Okay, I should say that the Southport Visitor article simply does not make reference to that fact. Check it for yourself, and please remove it as a source. I have spoken to Pink News and they will be removing the reference in their article. This leaves the Q Local Southport article as the only remaining source and I will inform you when it is amended. Once that has happened I expect editors to dutifully remove the reference. 194.60.38.227 (talk) 15:45, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You have successfully managed to come over as extremely pompous. People making comments allegedly on behalf of someone could at;east use there name.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 15:53, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The piece at Pink News is from an academic research project. You'd need to contact the LGBT Representation and Right Research Initiative to correct that. —C.Fred (talk) 15:53, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

I have spoken to them and they have agreed to remove their him from their records, regardless of the source's provenance 194.60.38.227 (talk) 16:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * That's not the indication they've given me. —C.Fred (talk) 16:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

I've just found this page from here, and I would like to point out that you should not make legal threats on Wikipedia (based on above "libellous" comment).  Seagull123  Φ  18:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

His own party say he is openly gay http://gscene.com/news/tories-have-most-out-candidates-standing-at-general-election/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.252.21 (talk) 17:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Drchriswilliams (talk) 14:28, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello, I'm Pablomartinez. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Neil O'Brien— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PabloMartinez (talk) 20:15, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm JRPG. I noticed that you recently removed content from George Freeman (politician) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.