User talk:194.60.38.229

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, 194.60.38.229. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Bridget Phillipson, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Cutlass. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Laurie Bristow, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cutlass Ciera 17:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Added a 2nd 'reliable' Source if the Daily Mail was not considered a 'reliable' source. 194.60.38.229 (talk) 13:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * You reinserted the Daily Mail reference. Don't do that again. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Why not, what is wrong with the Daily Mail when its reporting a fact? 194.60.38.229 (talk) 12:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * It now has the Times, and Sunday Times and Daily Mail. If I had time I could add the Commons inquiry, but that would be going overboard. So please leave it as it is. Ta 194.60.38.229 (talk) 12:28, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * See WP:DAILYMAIL.
 * Using a Bristow tweet to support the claim "He had previously been widely praised for his efforts and took to social media to thank the public for their support for himself and his team." is WP:original research. You need to find a better source. Robby.is.on (talk) 20:37, 11 March 2022 (UTC)