User talk:194.61.223.68

June 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Quranism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 12:57, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Quranism, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 10:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Sir Thomas Rich's School. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SovalValtos (talk) 20:46, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Quranism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:10, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Stop with the attempts to exclude non-Muslims from participation.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:15, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:58, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2019
Your recent editing history at Kala Kato shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Edible Melon (talk) 13:03, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 * , they're at it again - could you do the honours? Pinkbeast (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Athlete's foot have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:49, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Kathleen Rubins. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Participation of Local Areas (March 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Participation of Local Areas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Participation of Local Areas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Participation_of_Local_Areas Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WikiAviator&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Participation_of_Local_Areas reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiAviator (talk) 11:12, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

September 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Alison Lowe has been reverted. Your edit here to Alison Lowe was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

October 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Alvin and the Chipmunks. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to List of Strategic Air Command bases, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. ''You appear to be running a bot that is rampantly changing categories and appears to be invoking significant amounts of category redundancy. Please review the cats your bot is adding for each article to ensure it does not cross upstream cat paths with other cats which are already listed in the article. Nothing is gained by adding 2 or more cat paths that end at the same place.'' Picard&#39;s Facepalm (talk) 17:49, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Aérospatiale Gazelle, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 20:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Harvey Grammar School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''This address seems to have a history pof adding information without including a source (citation). If you've gone to the trouble of finding stuff out from a good source, please add the reference to the article. See WP:REFBEGIN for how to do this. Future unsourced edit may simply be removed, and you will have wasted your time, which would be a shame.'' Nick Moyes (talk) 20:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Changes made to Samworth Church Academy
I have deleted this addition made by someone using this IP address on 19 October 2021. No suitable reliable reference was provided, and I have been unable to find any mention anywhere that he was schooled at Sherwood Hall; likewise, nothing is included at Mark Henderson (lighting designer), or at his website. Discuss this below if necessary and I'll see it. Thank you.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 19:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Woody Woodpecker (2018 web series) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Woody Woodpecker (2018 web series) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCB2aeGGPNj7l5Z71bYNqX-) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:27, 1 November 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Recent categorisations
Keep going. Almost all of these are good: I did notice one mistake here, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EPPO_Code&curid=2174645&diff=1059440012&oldid=1055522230. That is not a pesticide or pesticide classification system and so doesn't belong in that Cat. (They were invented by Bayer, and related problems are solved with pesticides, however nonetheless...) I agree with everything else. Invasive Spices (talk) 9 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Most are good, but not all. For example, most entries in Category:Geochemistry journals don't belong in that cat. Most of those journals are more general, even though they might from time to time publish an article in the field of geochemistry. These journals belong in categories that are higher up the tree. If we would categorize journals in every field category that they occasionally publish articles in, just imagine how many cats a journal like, e.g., Science would be in... (Note that Science will occasionally publish sociology studies and such...) I'd appreciate if you could go over the geochemistry journals category again and remove all entries that are not exclusively geochemistry journals. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 16:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello, I'm InvalidOS. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bagdasarian Productions without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Invalid OS talk  13:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

15 January 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stoke Rochford Hall. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

This refers to your edits which I reverted with the edit summary "Rm vandalising contentious and unsourced editorializing added 9-11 November 2021". This level of warning is because the many previous warnings for disruptive editing seem to go unheeded. Acabashi (talk) 22:21, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions to History of air traffic control in the United Kingdom&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Wesoree (talk) 15:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Over and out 194.61.223.68 (talk) 15:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Brigg Grammar School, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Andethyst  (talk)  15:40, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Timothytyy. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Ross Bagdasarian Jr., but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Timothytyy (talk) 13:13, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bagdasarian Productions, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Heer and Luftwaffe Signals School
Hi Thanks for fixing the cats in the Heer and Luftwaffe Signals School. Its been needing done for a while.  scope_creep Talk  18:57, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Chuck E. Cheese, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 23:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)