User talk:194.63.116.72

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 14:12, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, I'm Zad68. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Adam F, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,   16:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blue-tongued skink. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 11:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

May 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 99.149.85.229 (talk) 13:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wyfold Challenge Cup, you may be blocked from editing. DouglasCalvert (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Your recent edit to the page Bernard Mendy appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:19, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Old Testament, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:00, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ashley Barnes because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gilliam (talk) 16:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014
Hello, I'm Ethically Yours. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Girl Scouts of the USA, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Ethically  Yours! 16:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Craig Bellamy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. LRD NO (talk) 10:31, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. I noticed that you made a change to an article, . Laser printing, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Carl Frampton. Murry1975 (talk) 17:55, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits as recently at David Nobbs. However pertinent or amusing the comment may be (to you if not to others) Nobbs Wiki page is not the place. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 12:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at David Nobbs (again!). Eagleash (talk) 13:16, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Romeo Parkes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 17:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, I'm IdreamofJeanie. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Phantom of the Opera (1986 musical) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 13:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on The Phantom of the Opera (1986 musical). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 15:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Terminological inexactitude— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello, I'm Samf4u. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my my talk page. - Samf4u (talk) 13:58, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Official language— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 14:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Rosebush, Pembrokeshire— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Crickhowell RFC


Hello, 194.63.116.72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Crickhowell RFC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amabel Hume-Campbell, 1st Countess de Grey has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:20, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amabel Hume-Campbell, 1st Countess de Grey was changed by 194.63.116.72 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926536 on 2020-01-29T11:20:11+00:00