User talk:194.81.79.241

February 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ivan VI of Russia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ivan VI of Russia was changed by 194.81.79.241 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889615 on 2019-02-01T11:33:16+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Terry Tamminen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether) 14:09, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Terry Tamminen, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Terry Tamminen was changed by 194.81.79.241 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952635 on 2019-02-12T13:53:36+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Terry Tamminen. DatGoodDude342 (talk) 13:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Recent edit to Harold Shipman
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Harold Shipman without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 13:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pearcy— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 09:52, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Deb (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 09:51, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:07, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm Nick Number. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to James Todd (boxer) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nick Number (talk) 17:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Murphy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 13:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Tree frog. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write.  Zai talk  12:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)