User talk:195.150.224.186

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Talk:Slavic neopaganism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Nyttend (talk) 17:48, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * No arguments provided. Please provide some arguments. I see none. Also I have been attacked by that ip user numerous times. Also without any argumentation. It's a common practice to support argumentation for such accusation. Isn't it? Atleast under laws of most countries.
 * All I did was asking for references and argumentation for his/her changes to the article. I recived none and was accused of spreading "Polish agenda or trying to push a Polish WP:POV", because I have noticed, that user keeps removing e.g. ukrainian term "ridnoviry" that is in use both in english language internet posts, articles and books ( I gave an example in reference to one of sections, sadly ip user that I "attacked" removed it without any explaination ). What polish agenda is in mentioning the fact that term ridnoviry is in use in english? It's of ukrainian, not polish origin.


 * I would like also to read opinions of other registred wikipedia users. Plus I also propsed blocking edition for this article for unregistred users.


 * Thank you in advance

195.150.224.186 (talk) 18:06, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The other guy's statements are backed up with diffs or are responses to things you've said at the talk page; his comments are not problematic for their tone or content, so no sanctions are warranted. On the other hand, see this edit, in which you repeatedly demean the other editor, whether "You are pathetic" or attributing his edits to hatred of Ukraine.  Scrolling farther up on the page reveals numerous additional examples of incivility.  Your comment of 19:54, 10 June 2014 accused the other editor of megalomenia, completely without evidence: WP:WIAPA requires solid evidence for such accusations, and "Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence" are considered personal attacks.  Comment on content, not on the contributor; if you continue with the incivility, you will be blocked.  Nyttend (talk) 22:32, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Well I will stop such harsh language then. But I want to notice that he/she was 1st who started use of "strong words toward opponent" by sugesting i am pushing "polish agenda". Sadly I still don't know what is "polish agenda" i am "pushing"? Is "polish agenda" not removing from article mentions that in ( written in english ) scientific publications are used also other terms that "rodnovery"? I see nowhere in his/her comments what is that mythical "polish agenda". I tried to make a contact with him/her and discuss that topic on talk page. All I get was silence ( ignoring my comments maybe? ) and removal from 1st paragraph mentions of those terms, often commented as "vandalism" or somewhat like that in tone. For me it's an arrogance. Was he/she warned? I changed my tone not so long time ago, mainly because sh/he kept ignoring arguments and discussions and because of his/her arrogance toward my changes in edit summaries. There were *lots* of edits. Is it also acceptable for you? If yes by what standards? I recommend you reading whole section of talk page called "Slavianism vs Rodnovery" to take a better wiev of this case. He/she started changing his argumentation for support of use of term "rodnovery" as the only name for slavic native faith in english that cames from ( not definied by him/her which exactly ) "slavic languages" when it was pointed out that many of those arguments can be same for ukrainian term "ridnoviry". For few months there was acceptable even for me form of 1st paragraph incorporating mention of ukrainian term "ridnoviry". But then suddenly it was totally reedited and ridnoviry together with references to online articles removed. No explaination provided in edit summary or talk page. OK, I will stop use of such harsh language I have used in discussion. Yet still recomend some serious discussion on that subject. There are really few serious questions about that user we can have. For example why are mentions of term "ridnoviry" and/or references to scientific publications and english language press articles mentioning that term removed by him/her from 1st paragraph? As i read talk page I see that it is not the only term he/she has. BTW are you into subject of slavic neopaganism? There are not too many editors around that are competent in that topic and that article needs some serious moderation. OK, I would be polite since now. I was just frustrated by lack of reactions from moderations and his/her lack of interest in discussing subject when I was polite. It's sad that only harsh language caused any reaction. But I am only human and my patience got limits.

195.150.224.186 (talk) 23:52, 12 July 2014 (UTC)