User talk:195.158.74.54

March 2022
Hello, I'm Bijoy2020. An edit that you recently made to Women in war seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! @@@ X yX   talk  12:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Deborah Sampson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Suonii180 (talk) 12:24, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Deborah Sampson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Suonii180 (talk) 10:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Virginie Ghesquière, you may be blocked from editing. Peaceray (talk) 15:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Leslie Joy Whitehead. Peaceray (talk) 15:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Jutta Rüdiger. Peaceray (talk) 15:34, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Women in World War I. Peaceray (talk) 15:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Virginie Ghesquière. Peaceray (talk) 15:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism, as done at Virginie_Ghesquière. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 16:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of female American Civil War soldiers, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ''You have again removed material without comment. Your edits seem to be pushing a point of view.'' Peaceray (talk) 15:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Women in combat, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 15:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Female Red Guards of the Finnish Civil War, you may be blocked from editing. Peaceray (talk) 15:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at 14th Searchlight Battery (Finland). Peaceray (talk) 15:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Women in firefighting. The source says 2.3% not 3%. Peaceray (talk) 15:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Rayna Kasabova. You seem to want to erase the fact that Rayna Kasabova was a nurse before she was a pilot. Peaceray (talk) 15:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 16:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please consider creating articles for Women in Red rather than chronocentrist negationism
I have seen some edits from several IP addresses, including this one, that attempt to suppress aspects of women's history. While I believe that these edits are an attempt at historical revisionism, I think that they are actually a chronocentrist approach that is historical negationism. Please consider that this is actually a form of antifeminism because it denies those actual conditions that women had to overcome.

If you truly want to advance how women are covered in Wikipedia, I strongly encourage you to explore WikiProject Women in Red, which seeks to create, translate, and improve biographies of notable women. Any effort towards this would be far more productive than any attempts to negate women's history. Peaceray (talk) 05:14, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm GabberFlasted. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Amazons, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GabberFlasted (talk) 11:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Rayna Kasabova, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Disruptive editing & no citation indicating she was a fighter pilot. No selective omission please. '' Peaceray (talk) 14:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fighter pilot, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 14:20, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Participation of women in the Olympics, you may be blocked from editing. Peaceray (talk) 14:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * This is your 4th warning. You have been vandalizing the article of Brita Hagberg under different IP-adresses by removing the obstacles the had to overcome, the pioneering role she played, and her notability, under this IP and under several different IP adresses. You have been wanred four times already. I have also notified another user. --Aciram (talk) 13:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fighter pilot. You introducted a factual error ("civilian American women"—>"miliary women") & removed material without explanation in the edit summary. Peaceray (talk) 14:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 20:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)