User talk:195.171.18.179

=Conflict of interest regarding Direct Line Group = Hello, 195.171.18.179. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:56, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Troy Deeney have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

shut up mate

October 2018
Hello, I'm Red Phoenix. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ruby (given name)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Red Phoenix talk  15:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dan. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dan was changed by 195.171.18.179 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861003 on 2018-10-24T15:13:52+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Croydon Cat Killer, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Croydon Cat Killer was changed by 195.171.18.179 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953099 on 2018-10-24T15:22:48+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:56, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Ruyter. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Parrott have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk.  — Ruyter (talk • edits)  22:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020
Hello, I'm A-NEUN. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Mike Denness—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. A-NEUN  &#10686;TALK&#10686;  18:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

July 2021
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)