User talk:195.224.174.243

Biased entry - below standards expected of Wikipedia
This is the only Wikipedia page I have read that I have found to be a one-sided prejudiced view of an individual. It consists almost entirely of negative publicity.

Even the first line describes her primarily as an 'anti-transgender activist' when in fact she is more accurately described as a 'gender critical activist'.

Almost every entry relates to negative publicity, and there is no attempt whatsoever at an even-handed article. This falls so far below the standards I expect of Wikipedia. I donate to the platform every year, and it's because it's an essential resource people rely on and we expect its content to be balanced and objective.

I do not know Ms Minshull, have never met her, and have no association with her or her causes, either directly or indirectly.

I have seen her interviewed, and the article is not a fair or an accurate reflection of her views or attitudes or intent. There is also very little information on her background or education. It's simply a list only of controversial issues, and some are not directly related to her.

This is shameful - it's unquestionably biased and needs to be changed. The author(s) should be answerable.

Wikipedia should not be a platform for identity politics. Noonenotable (talk) 10:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)