User talk:195.235.52.100

February 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dalziel High School has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:35, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dalziel High School was changed by 195.235.52.100 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856002 on 2019-02-06T22:35:56+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dalziel High School, you may be blocked from editing. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 22:39, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Canadian Indian residential school system, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 00:30, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Could you please elaborate on how linking to another relevant Wiki article can be interpreted as original research?

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Canadian Indian residential school system. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Meters (talk) 00:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

I did not attack any editors - I pointed out their likely bias based on: 1. Their recent edit history on directly related issue (Christianity) 2. Their edit patterns of the relevant articles (including deleting my previous responses on this page by editing it); common tactics include locking the article for unregistered editors while in fact targeting someone in particular; non-referencing their changes to the articles, or referencing only a part of their changes to cover for the others; working in covert concert with other editors to bury relevant information in articles of note over time; and interpreting Wikipedia's rules as it suits them. 3. It is well-known that Wikipedia's governance, US government ties and unaccountable, politically slanted, anonymous super-editors are the reason for the project's falling trust among users, NOT the users that work for objectivity (like me, dare I say). Wikipedia is quickly becoming the 50-cent army - not for China but for topics of particular interest to several western governments — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.235.52.100 (talk • contribs) 14:28, June 27, 2021 (UTC)
 * You made multiple attacks on user:Nikkimaria in your edit summaries. I stand by my warning, and you should consider yourself lucky that it was only a level 2 warning. Meters (talk) 16:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

That is entirely your interpretation with no reference to Wikipedia policies. Your messages are unwelcome here, I consider them harassment and will report them if you post again. Consider yourself lucky I am not going out of my way to look you up and investigate you properly.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Christianity and colonialism, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 16:12, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

No unsourced or poorly-sourced content was added by me to Christianity and colonialism - anyone can look at the article's history and see for themselves.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Christianity and colonialism. ''Not only is this not properly sourced, but it has nothing to do with the Age of Discovery. Take it to the article's talk page per WP:BRD or leave it alone.'' Meters (talk) 16:32, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Christianity and colonialism. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Meters (talk) 16:33, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

1. Article on Christianity and colonialism is not limited to Age of discovery (see article summary), nor it is intended to be. 2. My contribution was not under Age of discovery in the page structure/hierarchy. Please do stop vandalizing the article or you will be reported.

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 17:27, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Gillian McKeith, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 16:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Please stop whitewashing the page. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 16:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Who are you? The information is false and wikipedia should reflect the truth, not lies. 195.235.52.100 (talk) 16:08, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * To answer your first statement, beyond "Mako001" that is, quite frankly, absolutely none of your business.
 * To respond to the second one, verifiability is more important for an encyclopedia. Also see Verifiability, not truth for more details. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 16:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)