User talk:195.245.224.251

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Union Market Stability Reserve CO2 Emissions Trading System has been accepted
 European Union Market Stability Reserve CO2 Emissions Trading System, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:195.245.224.251 help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Kyoto protocol
He 195.245, just a short note to let you know I reverted your changes to the lede (and other sections) of Kyoto protocol. The hammering out of the lede on the talk page took 9 versions and I think a changes would be best first proposed also there (Talk:Kyoto protocol), also because I think the change introduced a fundamentally different view of the Kyoto protocol. I agree the commitments expired, but the Kyoto protocol was amended by Doha, which means that the Protocol legally did not expire.... That puts the whole lede quid in a different perspective. Anyway, good to have you editing on the subject; and if you'd like to contribute further to the Kyoto protocol lede, feel free to propose on talk! L.tak (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Dear IP-user. You have now 3 times tried to impose a new version of the lede on Kyoto Protocol, which has (IMO) real flaws. I started off a discussion on the lede after the second revert on Talk:Kyoto Protocol, and I would like to invite you to start a discussion there on how the lede should be structured. You seem to be quite knowledgeable about Kyoto and the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol so your input is very welcome; but discussions should really take place on the talk page... L.tak (talk) 18:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

European Union Emission Trading Scheme
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--greenrd (talk) 11:52, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Editing advice
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. PhilKnight (talk) 09:44, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Alert
greenrd (talk) 20:45, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

March 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ted Cruz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 11:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Ted Cruz
Please stop adding your unsourced opinion on Cruz's eligibility to run for President to the article. The topic has been discussed on the article's talk page and you are welcome to contribute there, and the possible controversy is dealt with later in the article, but what you have been adding is unsourced, not neutral and generally unhelpful. Melcous (talk) 12:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Middle income trap has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 22:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Middle income trap. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 22:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on George Soros. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:47, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.