User talk:195.65.152.92

December 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Virtual reality has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Virtual reality was changed by 195.65.152.92 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957848 on 2014-12-18T13:29:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atiq Sufi has been accepted
 Atiq Sufi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  SAMI  talk 07:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:195.65.152.92 help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Proposed deletion of Atiq Sufi


The article Atiq Sufi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Saqib (talk) 12:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Atiq Sufi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atiq Sufi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Atiq Sufi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 07:54, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Swagman has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Swagman was changed by 195.65.152.92 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965184 on 2015-04-21T05:55:46+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tony Leung Chiu-Wai. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sea Shepherd Conservation Society has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:45, 24 April 2015 (UTC) '
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sea Shepherd Conservation Society was changed by 195.65.152.92 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965521 on 2015-04-24T12:45:30+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -  Cwobeel   (talk)  14:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

June 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Social Democratic Party of Switzerland. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ZH8000 (talk) 17:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.