User talk:196.189.80.14

December 2021
Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you recently removed content from Professional Ethics (journal) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TylerBurden (talk) 14:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Professional Ethics (journal), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 14:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Professional ethics. --   LuK3      (Talk)   15:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 15:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)