User talk:196.41.28.106

Concern regarding Draft:Fohuy
Hello, 196.41.28.106. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fohuy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Fohuy


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Fohuy, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 21:48, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

May 2022
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Divock Origi for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 09:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Sport in the United Kingdom. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. TenWhile6 (talk) 10:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sport in the United Kingdom. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Chaos of Stars (talk) 06:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

June 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sport in the United Kingdom have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sport in the United Kingdom was changed by 196.41.28.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954149 on 2022-06-09T06:53:47+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jan van Riebeeck. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lefcentreright Discuss  17:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Emotive (sociology) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 09:24, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Cockcroft, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC)