User talk:197.224.29.67

March 2018
Hello, I'm Sid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kaal Bhairav Rahasya have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Please read WP:TVCAST as "Main Positive Lead" and "Former Dead Cast" are not valid subsections Sid95Q (talk) 11:36, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kaal Bhairav Rahasya, you may be blocked from editing. Hagennos Talk 13:33, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kaal Bhairav Rahasya. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Kaal Bhairav Rahasya was changed by 197.224.29.67 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897176 on 2018-03-06T13:38:09+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:38, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

WP:TVCAST
Hi there, believe it or not, we have guidelines for what we want articles to look like, we don't just copy other problematic articles. WP:TVCAST represents community preferences for cast lists. "Main" and "Recurring" are the standard subheadings we use. "Former" is not a valid subsection, because we care about the entire history of the cast, not just the most current lineup. "Main Positive Lead" is a bizarre choice, as is "Former(Dead)Cast" (even just for typographical reasons.) You did something similar here. Why would we need a unique section for one person? Also, isn't "Main and Lead" redundant? If someone's part of the main cast, we assume they are lead cast, especially if we're organising the cast per the on-screen credits, where the more important cast would go at the top. Here you introduced "Main Female Lead". Again, Main and Lead are pretty redundant, and do we need to be told who the females and males are? Isn't that something we can all figure out by looking at the screen? This is something that only seems to be an issue in Indian TV articles. Very bizarre. See also WP:ANTAGONIST. We don't need to slap protagonist/antagonist labels on cast members. These are interpretive. More helpful would be brief character descriptions that make it clear who the foils are. "John Doe is jealous of David's relationship with Shelley, and seeks to destroy David."

If you want to see what a quality cast list looks like, please see List of Millennium characters.

Oh, and this is indistinguishable from vandalism. If you want to talk to another user, go to the article's talk page or the user's talk page, but please don't leave snippy comments in the middle of the article. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:23, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I think this will help you.Sid95Q (talk) 16:57, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 00:16, 7 March 2018 (UTC)