User talk:197.231.2.2

June 2020
Hello, I'm CrazyBoy826. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.    Crazy Boy  826  18:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

"Episodic Role" "Supporting Role" and other interpretive garbage
Stop adding pointless content like "Episodic Role" and "Supporting Role" and other interpretive garbage to articles as you've done at Aalisha Panwar, for instance here from another IP. Not only are you miscapitalising, but you're failing to distinguish in any meaningful way the difference between an episodic role, supporting role and recurring role, which renders these changes as entirely useless from an academic standpoint. Further, we don't care about your personal interpretations or subjective evaluations about a cast member's importance in a series. See also WP:PROTAGONIST and you might want to look at Jennifer Aniston filmography so you can see what a quality filmography is supposed to look like, unlike the litany of mistakes we find in Indian entertainment articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)