User talk:1977Qatari

With a name like "Tyrenon", I would assumed that you are African American male and may have some knowledge on how Black Fraternal and Sororal Organizations work and the difference. You can also reach to the President of Phi Delta Psi at national.board@phideltapsifraternity.org Feel Free to call our President who works for a Trademark and copyright Law Firm (Fross and Zelnick) who can verify this information (212)813-8253.

Do you really think that an organization will spend thousands of dollars to create a presentable National webpage for puporseless sense of self. We are organization who are branching away from our brother Fraternity to best serve the minorities women in our community who are dying of AIDS and Breast Cancer. Those are the 2 majors components and focus of our organization. For many decades we have been mainly under the chain of command of our brother Fraternity (Phi Delta Psi).

Mr Tyrenon:

What is specifically we have give you, we have reached out to many organizations, they have confimed that they did not go through to such scrutinity for an open source site site such wikipedia.

If the site need to be rewritten on a specific format, please let us know but I can assure you that there no infringement of any sort.

Question about Phi Rho Epsilon
Do you have anything available that shows that Phi Rho Epsilon exists, let alone is notable enough for an encyclopedia entry? I've been trying, and the only thing I can find is the website -- which has no content. The Phi Delta Phi website doesn't mention anything about Phi Rho Epsilon. Please help. If there's isn't any evidence of existence and notability, it is likely that the article will be deleted. Thank you. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phi Rho Epsilon


The article Phi Rho Epsilon has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenceable -- I can't find any proof that this exists at all.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArglebargleIV (talk) 11:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Phi Rho Epsilon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phi Rho Epsilon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Phi Rho Epsilon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ArglebargleIV (talk) 18:10, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Phi Rho Epsilon


A tag has been placed on Phi Rho Epsilon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tyrenon (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
What are you confused on?

 H A I R Y   Z E R  03:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Speedy deletion nomination of Phi Rho Epsilon


A tag has been placed on Phi Rho Epsilon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. StarM 01:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Your addition to Phi Rho Epsilon has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. StarM 02:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Please also stop spamming wikipedia with your sorority. It isn't notable and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion. StarM 02:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC)