User talk:198.135.125.85

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kamov. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2001 Bangladeshi-Indian border skirmish. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CAIC Z-10. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kamov. - stop removing sourced information and adding your own interpretation.

Vandalism and sock puppetry
please read wikipedia guidlines on WP:Sock and Wp:Vandal before continuing your disruptive edits on the Kamov and CAIC Z-10 pages. you have used multiple ip's "198.135.125.90", "198.135.125.85" besides the account "Shulinjiang" to make edits to the pages in the attempt to make it look like multiple editors were editing the pages which constitutes an act of sock puppetry. removing sourced content and leaving inline biased comments constitutes an act of vandalism. both of these are ban-able offenses and if you continue to do so you will be reported and banned. The one of the links you keep adding to both of these articles is a bulletin board and is not a reliable source according to Wp:RS and neither of the sources are not "official" as you claim. furthermore BOTH of the sources you seem to cite do not agree with what you are claiming at all. they only mention that the subsequent design work was done in china and that the original design work was done by kamov, which has already been established in the articles. failure to understand the rules and continuing your acts of vandalism and sockpuppetry will result in you being banned. you have been warned. Pvpoodle (talk) 18:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

48 hour block
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 06:34, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Longest words has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Longest words was changed by 198.135.125.85 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914106 on 2015-10-06T23:00:51+00:00.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Longest words with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018
Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hohmann (surname)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)