User talk:198.151.130.152

December 2012
Hello, I'm Irn. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Danah boyd because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Irn (talk) 20:24, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Kagawa Prefecture has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kagawa Prefecture was changed by 198.151.130.152 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957936 on 2013-04-25T15:48:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shinji Kagawa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 15:56, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Rutgers spelled in hedge photo
My photo is a public domain photo. You can use it for any purpose without getting any permission, no need to attribute me as photographer but you can if you wish. Hope you like it! Sorry I didn't get the leftmost R in more sunlight. Good luck with your brochure.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 18:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Bill Gothard. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StAnselm (talk) 19:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bill Gothard.  Velella  Velella Talk 19:50, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop editing the article on Bill Gothard to make it reflect only his own views. Wikipedia should be an unbiased source of information; your inclusion of only the information that Gothard himself gives about his work lends a very strong bias to the article. Thanks.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)