User talk:198.179.4.250

July 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Alex Kingston has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Alex Kingston was changed by 198.179.4.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959801 on 2017-07-31T15:55:55+00:00.

October 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jebcubed (talk) 13:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

March 2019
Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Le'Veon Bell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Tanya Saracho. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 19:25, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tamar Braxton, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pine Gap. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 14:48, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2020
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Kathy Augustine. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. OcarinaOfTime (talk) 21:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Murder of Donna Jones. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Murder of Donna Jones was changed by 198.179.4.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963385 on 2020-06-19T21:05:13+00:00

January 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2021 Michelin Pilot Challenge—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Bingobro. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Umhlanga (ceremony) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Bingo bro  (Chat)  15:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)