User talk:198.188.7.90

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Juanes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:11, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Juanes was changed by 198.188.7.90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921419 on 2015-05-15T16:11:43+00:00.

March 2016
Hello, I'm Dbfirs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nerd has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  D b f i r s   21:56, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Book burning has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:18, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Book burning was changed by 198.188.7.90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.981407 on 2016-03-30T21:18:50+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Status quo. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Status quo was changed by 198.188.7.90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866225 on 2016-03-30T21:32:43+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Status quo with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Rainbow City, Alabama—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 19:03, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Liancourt Rocks dispute, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. STATZET (talk) 20:26, 19 July 2022 (UTC)