User talk:198.2.103.209

December 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Sue-Ann Levy, you may be blocked from editing. Swil999 (talk) 10:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Bud, I would think you'd have to substantiate your claims that my edits are disruptive/defamatory, you can't just remove things you don't like for no reason.

If you could explain, specifically, why my edits are defamatory—meaning that they are untrue—then I will happily desist.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Sue-Ann Levy) for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing/vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 5 albert square (talk) 14:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Reverted Edit on Sue-Ann Levy
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.HouseBlaster (talk) 19:06, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not mark your edits with inappropriate edit summaries, as you did at Sue-Ann Levy. Your edits have been reverted or removed as unconstructive, and the use of deceptive or inappropriate edit summaries is considered disruptive editing; you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Regarding the same edit: Please stop using inaccurate editing summaries which you have done for every edit or you may be blocked for WP:NOTHERE. If you would like to demonstate WP:HERE, please make constructive edits. You should likely avoid making edits on Sue-Ann Levy unless uncontroversial or if you wish to make a change please first discuss so on the talk page to avoid being blocked given past warnings.

February 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Sue-Ann Levy.   RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)