User talk:198.246.186.210

January 2016
Hello, I'm Donner60. An edit you recently made to Ammar (name) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016
Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Southern New Hampshire University— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, I'm CityOfSilver. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of pop punk bands, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  City O f  Silver  14:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of pop punk bands, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  City O f  Silver  14:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, I'm 72. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —72 talk 17:55, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —72 talk 18:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017
Hello, I'm Shaidar cuebiyar. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Madame Nhu have been reverted or removed because they could seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:17, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Madame Nhu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:55, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm Zortwort. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Emma Nutt— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Zortwort (talk) 19:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, I'm Galobtter. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Emma Nutt have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Galobtter (talk) 15:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Emma Nutt have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 21:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Sarah Jeong. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 03:39, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madame Nhu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PohranicniStraze (talk) 18:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Madame Nhu, you may be blocked from editing. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:43, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Madame Nhu. PohranicniStraze (talk) 18:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Commodore Nutt have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 12:09, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Commodore Nutt, you may be blocked from editing. Peacock (talk) 14:42, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2021
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PohranicniStraze (talk) 21:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC) Ligma 198.246.186.210 (talk) 15:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Nick Groff, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Squeakachu (talk) 19:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nick Groff, you may be blocked from editing. Schazjmd  (talk)  18:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)