User talk:198.254.115.152

Rosaria Butterfield
There are a couple of issues with your edits. Firstly, the claim about still having lesbian desires needs a reliable source. Secondly, she describes herself as being postmodern in her thinking and then changing. Is there a better way of saying this? StAnselm (talk) 04:58, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

The still having lesbian desires part comes from the Christianity Today article cited in the entry ("like a knife"), but it's ambiguous, I agree, so I give. But I still don't see any evidence of postmodernity. She wrote a fairly run-of-the-mill dissertation on Gothic literature, the type that thousands of PhD students submit every year. It's pretty standard literary theory. I suppose we could say something like "professor who in retrospect believes she was thinking postmodernly" but that's awkward and I don't see what it contributes. (If anything, her thinking is postmodern now: "the job of an adjective is to change the noun" departs from every known dictionary definition of an adjective, whose job it is not to change the noun but to describe it. Possibly this is worth mentioning in the article?)