User talk:199.116.174.170

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Weight Watchers has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Weight Watchers was changed by 199.116.174.170 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861358 on 2016-01-31T17:31:18+00:00.

Talvivaara Mining Company
There's a bit of trouble in the edit history--nothing major yet. Drmies (talk) 16:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

WAT 199.116.174.170 (talk) 16:15, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

February 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Hyde.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 22:06, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTVANDALISM Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Find a source that supports what you're trying to add, get consensus for adding it, follow the rules. 199.116.174.170 (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   04:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

please by all means explain to me how removing unsourced accusations of holocaust denialism from a BLP page is disruptive editing. 199.116.174.170 (talk) 04:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't know if you are right or not, but you edit warred to keep your edit in place. If you are correct, you should have no problem discussing it. 331dot (talk) 05:02, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Policy says the material I reverted not only can but *should* be removed without waiting for discussion. Even so, I gave an edit summary as why I was removing it, I replied to user:Mrschimpf on my talk page and left him a warning on his. I'm not sure how much more I'm supposed to "discuss" this as the onus should be on him to discuss before adding it back in. And if the reason I'm blocked is edit warring with him, why is he not similarly blocked? I'd like to know for future reference. I'm blocked for "vandalism" but according to policy I did not vandalize. Should I simply have been quicker on the draw to report him to the vandalism noticeboard first? 199.116.174.170 (talk) 05:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Source #3 clearly says that the subject mocks and denies the existence of the Holocaust; can't get clearer than that. That's the reason for reversion, and you clearly used an IPv6 to try to remove it, which turns it into tenuous editing. This and the Million Dollar Extreme articles are whack-a-mole articles where sourced information is removed by SPAs to make the group look better. That isn't happening. And I clearly say on my talk page to explain your edits. Dropping a uw-biog3 template there without further explanation doesn't do much to explain your edits. This is all I will say on the subject, and I hope you come back from your block ready to collaborate rather than try to force a certain viewpoint.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)