User talk:199.192.98.51

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crumbl Cookies (June 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Valereee was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crumbl Cookies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crumbl Cookies, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Crumbl_Cookies Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Valereee&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Crumbl_Cookies reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—valereee (talk) 17:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crumbl Cookies (July 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tol were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crumbl Cookies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crumbl Cookies, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Crumbl_Cookies Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tol&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Crumbl_Cookies reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol &#124; talk &#124; contribs 19:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crumbl Cookies (July 17)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Crumbl_Cookies Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CodeLyoko was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Constant rejects with not much improvement between each one, Comapany might possibly be notable but until better sources can be found, its not likely to get approved.

CodeLyoko talk  01:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)