User talk:199.247.110.101

November 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Henry Capehart. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ...GELongstreet (talk) 23:03, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Ppt91. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to 2023 China balloon incident have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ppt91 (talk) 04:16, 7 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Why would it be considered nonconstructive when it specifically asked to add a short description? 199.247.110.101 (talk) 04:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The lead already includes the most relevant information and acts as an effective summary of the rest of the article. Adding another summary was redundant. Please see WP:CREATELEAD Ppt91 (talk) 04:20, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the explanation, will not do that in the future 199.247.110.101 (talk) 04:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Happy to help. Feel free to always post on my talk page if you have any questions in the future! Ppt91 (talk) 04:26, 7 February 2023 (UTC)