User talk:19bw97

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ponus Ridge Middle School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Canthusus (talk) 19:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Monty 845  19:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kirk's dik-dik, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kirk's dik-dik was changed by 19bw97 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890132 on 2012-05-18T15:21:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:21, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Engel Cordero
Hello 19bw97,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Engel Cordero for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Cgtdk (talk) 23:50, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Cgtdk may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Cgtdk (talk) 00:00, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:Cgtdk. Tgeairn (talk) 00:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Engel Cordero
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Engel Cordero. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:04, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Engel Cordero. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:06, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Engel Cordero, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:08, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Reported to AIV
Hi 19bw97, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported your removal of speedy deletion templates at Engel Cordero to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:08, 7 December 2012 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:00, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Why Eli Erlickson Should Not Have a Wikipedia Page, and Why My Persecution by Wikipedia for Defending the Legitimacy of Science Must Stop
How do I cite life experience? How about she cites her wikipedia page with legitimate sources.
 * Well, you are coming off as a crank. There are plenty of cites to reliable sources for the content. To challenge content you would need to show the content is not supported by the sources. Unless you have information from WP:reliable sources unconnected with the subject, with a reputation for fact checking, that contradicts the article content, the cited content stands. Further, negative unsourced, potentially defamatory content cannot and will not be included in this encyclopedia. If you are looking for a platform from which to condemn and criticize, or proclaim the "truth" about the subject of a Wikipedia article, you will need to find some other venue. Sorry, no.--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 01:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Meh. Don't know if you noticed I removed the rational. I'll be revdeling soon.--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 01:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * - I had not. Upon review of the now-deleted revision, I still don't see a reason to unblock. SQL Query me!  01:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)