User talk:1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR/Archives/2016/December

Articles for deletion/NYX Cosmetics
I went over the article in question, and sourced all statements to apparently reliable sources, while removing anything that sounded promotional. I would appreciate it if you would take another look at the article. Thanks! Edison (talk) 23:25, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Alakanani Itireleng
Draft:Alakanani Itireleng, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alakanani Itireleng and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Alakanani Itireleng during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Blockverify
Draft:Blockverify, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Blockverify and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Blockverify during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

comments about others
I suppose that you might discount this because of your presumed general opinion of me, but I have found it not a good idea to specifically say you are following a articular editor. in looking at multiple works from an editor, not to say specifically what you are doing. It can look too much like wikihounding. As you have seen, I will support you when you do identify an actual problem.  DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * User:DGG: I follow you, because you are the problem. You should resign your admin bit and arb, and find something else to do.   Good day sir.  --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 05:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I wasn't thinking about myself. You may follow me as much as you please--quite a few people do. I don't think I have ever complained about how people think of me, or deal with me. I But we might even find some way of working together, since we do have some common ground, as some recent discussions show.   DGG ( talk ) 06:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Really, I am serious, dear User:DGG. You should immediately resign from arb and your admin bit.  We don't have to drag your "breaches" into the public discussion, it won't be pretty.  Just find some other hobby.   Really, you need to go. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * you are one of the only two people in WP who has said so. I've known the other guy a long time, and since he is able to explain himself,we have had polite discussion, and remain friends of a sort.   Just what are you complaining about? What have I done as an arb that you do not like?  What have I done as an admin that seriously  breaks the rules for admins? or persistently done wrong as an editor?  Of mown volition I shall remain an arb until I   either lose an election or or bored with it, and the second will probably be sooner. I shall remain as an admin and an ed. until there's a successful arb case against me, or I get too old to participate and lose interest, or get   frustrated enough in having to deal receptively   with the same problems.  As there;s never been a negative sanction agains me herein an forum, I don''t think I'll end up leaving unwillingly. You are welcome to try; its only fair to warn you to beware of the boomerang. But I cam here to try to reach sone kind of informal modus vivendi, as I have with modt of the people taking my side in notability issues.   DGG ( talk ) 10:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Your continued presence on this project is an insult. You really should be ashamed.  Go ahead and try to throw smoke screens up if you wish.   For the good of the project, you should just go.  Find another hobby.  --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 12:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter #2
Hello ,


 * Please help reduce the New Page backlog 

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.


 * Getting the tools we need

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
 * Improve the tools: Vote here.
 * Reduce your review load: Vote here

12:53:55, 14 December 2016 review of submission by Abhilashpatil
I am following this author, Yogesh Chabria but I didnn't find any wikipedia page about him. He is a motivational speaker at many conferences and has best seller investing book series published by CNBC and Netwrok 18. Also, he is an entrepreneur himself. I think he is really an inspiration for many. Please let me know why his page cannot be published.

Thanks, Abhilash


 * Hi. The draft was reviewed by another editor, maybe they can give some guidance.  You may post a message on their talk page to ask them.  --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 17:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

PROD
You seem to be de-prodding quite a few company articles. While the requirements for de-prodding something are intentionally low, this seems like an attempt to de facto make company articles exempt from PROD entirely. For example, can you explain why something you seem to agree should be speedily deleted should be de-prodded except to make a point about process? Huon (talk) 10:54, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know what you are trying to say, but whatever your POINT is, I don't understand. Also, you attempts at reading my mind are unwelcome.  Good day sir/madam.  --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 14:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I asked you to explain your rationale because I don't want to have to rely on mind-reading to understand what you're trying to achieve. The lack of an explanation is noted. Thus I'll have to continue to rely on what it looks like to me from the outside. Huon (talk) 18:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Have fun! --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 18:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
Happy Holidays text.png Hello 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America1000 15:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Deletion inquiry
I'm wondering if you'd kindly be interested in assessing Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heap_(company) (since you participated in a Luxe/Verbling deletion discussion). It seems users DGG and SwisterTwister routinely vote for deletion together without offering analysis, so I wanted to get a third-party involved. I'm not fishing for a keep, but I am looking for a legitimate discussion if possible. Thanks for any consideration. GDWin (talk) GDWin —Preceding undated comment added 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The issue you raise is part of a long-term disruption, and will require community involvement to solve for the long-term. Looking for legitimate discussion is a fine goal, but not something you're going to see much at AFD while there is this long-term disruption taking place.  Don't be baited by the disrupters, they thrive on long, involved discussion threads where they can repeat their baseless claims over, and over, and over again.   --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 18:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It's long term disagreement; calling it disruption implies a unchangeable fixed position to which any disagreement is disruptive. The disagreement is about whether WP:NOTDIRECTORY is policy and whether NOTADVERTISING applies to small organizations. I support really well sourced articles for a companies that has done something notable or distinctive, or is a leader in its field. Unfortunately the way we decide is my arguing over the meaning of he adjectives in references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements, and many cases can be seen in different ways depending on what is desired.  I support attempts at quantitative standards about the subjects.  DGG ( talk ) 19:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Solodev for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solodev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Solodev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 00:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Diep.io reliable sources
Can you help me explain which ones are notable? Also, wings.io has very few and i want to know how to do the same for diep.io. 74.105.140.90 (talk) 15:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Wings.io doesn't look notable yet. It will most likely get sent to WP:AFD soon unless someone finds better sources.
 * For notability and Draft:Diep.io, I'd advise posting a polite message at the WP:TEAHOUSE, where other wikipedians may be able to help you. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 20:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)