User talk:1brilliant1

November 2011
Please stop adding yourself-you're not notable unless you've received reliable-source press. Bit parts don't mean you can plaster yourself all over the Wikipedia.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:38, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
I was under the impression that the Five Pillars of Wikipedia would be followed by established contributors based on their experience. New to the process of contributing, I will endeavor to follow your recommendation to cite future edits as I should have initially. The second sentence of your statement however is clearly an interpretation, an opinion, an assertion about the credibility of my subject on your part that is not only false but violates the spirit of what this organization stands for if the Five Pillars are worth anything. All I ask for is a modicum of respect and civility. Please refrain from your disparaging comments.--1brilliant1, (talk)7 December 2011 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest
Hello 1brilliant1. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Larry Laverty, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. All of your edits have been attempts to insert Larry Laverty into Wikipedia. An established editor has expressed concern that you might be Laverty, someone who knows him, or one of his agents attempting to insert him into Wikipedia. I wanted to make sure that you are aware of not only the policy on conflict of interest editing, but also the policy about WP:ADVERT. Constantly adding a person into various parts of Wikipedia can be seen as promotion and could lead to you being blocked.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:48, 7 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:01, 7 December 2011 (UTC) I'm honestly not sure if this actor passes WP:NACTOR. It appears that he's done mostly small bit parts, which generally are not considered to be notable enough to pass the criteria. Sometimes bit actors can pass notability guidelines if they've done an enormous amount of work, such as hundreds of roles, but not many people pass this part of the guideline. I highly, HIGHLY, HIGHLY recommend that since there is the possibility of a conflict of interest and Laverty's notability is questionable, that you talk to the people in WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers about helping set up the article for you. They can also help teach you what is considered to be a reliable source since none of the links in the article are considered to be reliable sources per WP:RS and do not show the notability of the author. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:01, 7 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

December, 2011
As a new contributor to Wikipedia, I am astounded by the lack of scholarship and heartfelt support that I have encountered here. First of all, for the above reviewer to presume that the disparaging comments of another editor are true and then go on to base an opinion on that initial tone and false accusation is discouraging to say the least. Any simple perusal of the internet will reveal that my subject is definitely not as stated by the reviewer merely a "performer of small bit parts." Further, to imagine that my subject or his agents have somehow publicized inaccurate information of major roles played on dozens of websites, as is implied, is absurd. Finally, to assume that there is a conflict of interest based on what has been interpreted as a lack of neutrality in the language of my original draft is to call into question the legitimacy of countless biographical articles on Wikipedia as I read dozens of biographies prior to writing and adopted the tone and language that I had noted as standard on Wikipedia. 1brilliant1 (talk)15:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)1brilliant1

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Larry Laverty concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Larry Laverty, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:34, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Larry Laverty


Hello 1brilliant1. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Larry Laverty.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Larry Laverty concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Larry Laverty, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Larry Laverty concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Larry Laverty, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Larry Laverty concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Larry Laverty, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 25 November 2017 (UTC)