User talk:1govek

December 2017
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bristol City F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bristol City F.C., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Hello, I'm Gaioa. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bristol City F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (talk) 13:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bristol City F.C.. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:55, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Matty,

It's not vandalisation! Why are you not open to discussion!? This is ridiculous! Its cited/referenced.

To Matty
Apologies Matty,

I'm merely correcting the information on said page. The club was indeed founded in 1982 as it had gone bankrupt that year. Sources have already been referenced if you had looked.

Have a good one, 1govek 1govek (talk) 08:48, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 17:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Matty,

In what way is this disruptive editing? It's factually correct. Referenced as well? And I'm a Bristol City fan!

January 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Bristol City F.C.. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:09, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 22:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bristol City F.C.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 10:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bristol City F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Kosack (talk) 16:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Hey, Kosack

Not sure what you mean by disruptive editing. Everything edited is referenced and correct. I would appreciate it if you discussed it with me rather than balckmail/threaten me.

Regards K


 * None of the edits you made included a source and the article does not contain any sources supporting that the club is a separate entity than the original club. Not sure how warning messages qualify as blackmail. Judging by the list of previous messages above, this is not the first time you have been warned over making these edits yet you continue to make them with no consensus established or even a single reference to support them. Kosack (talk) 07:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bristol City F.C.. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bristol City F.C.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 11:53, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Can I edit now?
Can I please be allowed to edit now! I don't want to be punished like I child.

Come on, we're all friends here! Let me back in fellas? 1govek (talk) 22:49, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bristol City F.C.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Mistake
Hi,

Please refrain from moving my edits off the page. I believe they are justified and evidenced correctly in line with your policy.

Please, do the right thing.

Cheers 1govek (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Clearly these edits are not inline with Wikipedia policy when you have already received more than one ban over the matter. If you continue to make the same edit without achieving any type of consensus to implement them, you will just end up blocked for an even longer period of time or even indefinitely. Kosack (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

I keep getting blocked because nobody gives me a chance to explain myself.

Anyway, I'm off to end it all soon so you won't have to worry.


 * You are more than welcome to discuss your edits, either on the article talk page or at WP:Football. Repeatedly making the same edits is not the way to implement any changes if you believe they are correct. Kosack (talk) 08:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, I just wanted to leave this here. Please be safe. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bristol City F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Kosack (talk) 21:28, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.