User talk:1pinkpanda1/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, 1pinkpanda1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- intgr [talk] 12:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

hostadvice.com
Hi! I'm all for removing unncessary external links and unreliable statistics. But can you please explain, why you think that the website is a "disreputable source"? -- intgr [talk] 12:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi! I was concerned because the stats on that site don't provide a source or any data to back them up. All the links to the site that I found followed the exact same format, "_______ holds __% of market share," which is already a pretty meaningless statistic as written.  Many of these sentences seemed pretty out of place too, like they might've just been there for promotional purposes.  Either way, I don't think those links and statistics were adding much to the articles.  Let me know if you have any suggestions as to how to handle these types of edits in the future.  Thanks! -- 1pinkpanda1 (talk) 07:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Why?
Yes, I am interested to know why you are reverting on List of popes. You haven't specified a reason for your reverts, and you are marking them "minor" as if they were vandalism. They are clearly not vandalism. I'd venture to say that the edits are constructive and you're obstructing some good work. Now please stop edit-warring (yes, I know the IP is rude to you and he needs to be WP:CIVIL) and discuss on the talk page if you feel the edits are somehow unconstructive. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 02:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks like someone has been a naughty boy. Shame, shame on you. Ignorance may be pardoned, but disobeying... --188.217.50.30 (talk) 02:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi. Admittedly I made a mistake by reverting a factually correct edit with an unprofessional edit summary that appeared to me to be vandalism at a glance. I reverted once more upon noticing an edit summary targeted at specific users including myself. I ceased reverting edits to the original page beyond this point, as I did some research and discovered that some of the edits had a factual basis.  I did still revert an abusive targeted edit made to my talk page.  The two reverts were negligence on my part; I apologize.  My goal was not to start an edit war.1pinkpanda1 (talk) 03:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, unprofessional summaries! You could have checked my actual edits instead, that would have been better. Also forgive me for being, uhm... I just lose my head when my edits (all of which have factual basis, as far as possible) are arbitrarily reverted (trust me, that happens a lot to me). I always have to be on the defensive. Curiously, things got much better lately under this regard on the Italian WP, while the level of alert caused by IP editings is more or less stationary on here. --188.217.50.30 (talk) 03:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pimelea rosea


The article Pimelea rosea has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No content except an infobox.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  10:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Please remember that an infobox is an optional extra for an article: text is essential. Pam  D  10:04, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry, was still working on this and just really taking my time. Adding more content now. 1pinkpanda1 (talk) 10:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I've now added some content to the article to remedy the tagged issues, and removed the tags. Let me know if this is alright, and if you have any suggestions. Thanks! 1pinkpanda1 (talk) 10:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Pimelea longiflora) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Pimelea longiflora, 1pinkpanda1!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for uploading this article. Everything seems to be covered, although it is still ab bit too short to be really meaningful. Do you want to add the height also in feet for our American friends? Did you already search for a suitable photo?"

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kelly bag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trapezium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daphne caucasica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucacus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Daphne arisanensis
 * added a link pointing to Yushan


 * Daphne calcicola
 * added a link pointing to George Forrest

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi 1pinkpanda1, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  00:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Fabulous! Thank you! 1pinkpanda1 (talk) 08:36, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Hurry (businessman)


A tag has been placed on John Hurry (businessman) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Magnolia677 (talk) 02:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Alright, thank you. I am reviewing the criteria to better understand the reasoning. 1pinkpanda1 (talk) 04:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of InMoment for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InMoment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/InMoment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SK2242 (talk) 20:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)