User talk:1subwoofer

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Victuallers (talk) 07:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

December 2008
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. SEO75  [  talk  ] 09:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Parkdale Secondary College
Please do not cut and paste content from coprighted web pages - refer WP:COPYVIO for further details. Melburnian (talk) 06:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Patterson Lakes, Victoria
Hi 1subwoofer! :) I am just letting you know that all of your edits made to Patterson Lakes, do not have references or summaries. I am asking you to please, reference each section you have made/edited on the article, because all unreferenced data, may be challenged and or removed. Thank You -- MelbourneStar☆ (talk) 08:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi MelbourneStar. I basically added almost all of the information on the Patterson Lakes page. I will add references where I can, however not all of the page can be referenced, because what I have added in some cases is in a sense 'local knowledge.'
 * Hi 1Subwoofer.
 * I have kept the 'Citations Needed' signs on the article, as they are required. Please add as many reliable references ASAP, and there may be a problem because unfortunately, Wikipedia does not accept Original Research that cant be back up by sources. Its a pain, yes, but I dont make the rules here. Thank You -- MelbourneStar☆ (talk to me) 02:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

History of MRI
Hello 1subwoofer. Thanks for your recent addition to the History section of the MRI page (I guess you were the anon who previously added Bottomley also?). It's a bit biased/incomplete though, don't you think? Where is Peter Mansfield and the rest of the Nottingham people? Rex Richards team in Oxford? Richard Ernst in Zurich? Paul Bottomley in New York? Even Raymond Damadian surely deserves a mention here? John Mallard's group in Aberdeen? And that's just the old imaging history - there are a bunch of more recent inventions that are part of a standard clinical scanner. How about Dan Sodickson and Klaas Pruessmans for SMASH and SENSE? I'm not saying PB didn't play a significant part - he did - but there were many others too. Your addition makes it sound rather like PB was a one-man show. GyroMagician (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Maps
Hello, not my maps, they are quite good. I'm working my way through Melb subs but a bit of help would be welcome- just add to the Infobox at top of page and map appears. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 03:38, 22 May 2011 (UTC)).
 * alternative_location_map = Australia Victoria metropolitan Melbourne
 * longd=144.xxx|latd=37.xxx

June 2012
Your recent editing history at Paul Bottomley (scientist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. 69.155.128.40 (talk) 04:46, 17 June 2012 (UTC)