User talk:2.138.252.4

Reverted Edits
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I reverted a few of your edits relating to "see also" sections in articles. I don't want to discourage you from editing, however, you thinking that two cars look kind of similar is not usually enough to warrant them being included in each other's see also section. That section is usually reserved for cars that are directly related mechanically, directly inspired by the other's design (this one usually should be accompanied by a reliable source or two), or otherwise their histories are strongly intertwined. Additionally, many of your edits were adding these links into parts of the article like "sources" or "external links" which is not where those links belong. TKOIII (talk) 17:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I disagree with you, as coincidences in the shape of body in two cars close in time but from different producers, American and European, is relevant to the history of any car, mine is not a large addition consuming a lot of space, and encyclopedias are better as it contain more info, please revert the deletion, excessive, close to vandalic 2.138.252.4 (talk) 08:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)