User talk:2.223.59.204

Everything I posted was true, I have provided sources and it keeps getting deleted. I have become more and more aware that Wikipedia is heavily biased and i'm sick of it. I won't be making any more financial donations, so you can stop asking me too, before every time you asked, I donated and even donated when you didn't ask. Keep your left wing bias articles, I'm done. 02.06.2022

June 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Shamima Begum, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shadow4dark (talk) 20:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 20:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * I have provided sources for my edits, the sources provided for Begum being stateless are out of date. Why is Wikipedia trying hide facts? I have provided sources to prove my claims, whats the problem? The High Court has ruled Begum is a BAngladeshi Citizen, I have provided the source, why is |Wikipedia insisting on telling lies, that Begum is stateless? If you continue doing this, I will have to research a way to find recourse, by reporting you to whatever relevant authority. If it isn't changed to Begum being a Bangladeshi Citizen, which is a fact and the sources prove that, I'm going to bring it to the attention of many websites who hold an interest in this kid of censorship. 2.223.59.204 (talk) 21:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I have reported this biased censorship and hiding of infornmation directly to Wikipedia. It's out of your hands now. 2.223.59.204 (talk) 22:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

I have contacted Wikipedia directly about this censorship issue. I have been advised to ask you why you keep reverting the article and are refusing the accept the edits and the sources provided for the edits? Could you please explain why you are witholding information from the general public and are censoring articles in a politically biased manner? I am told to await your reply and to contact Wikipedia again if you cannot give a satisfactory reply. I was advised Wikipedia is a collaborative project, however censorship in the long term won't be tolerated. So, would you please just let me know why you are refusing to publish facts?
 * It's not a fact but a government claim opposed by a other government. You should at disputed and add a footnote on citizenship. Shadow4dark (talk) 21:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)