User talk:2.24.14.41

August 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Nisha Batra, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Meena • 11:18, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi 2.24.14.41! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Steph Haydock several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. signed,Rosguill talk 19:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Steph Haydock
Do you have sources which discuss this character in detail? If not, this article is likely to be redirected or deleted. Ovinus (talk) 19:17, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:47, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.