User talk:2.26.250.29

December 2011
Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Jim1138. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Philip Locke with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 04:35, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

de-linking Battle of Isandlwana
Your efforts to improve the article are appreciated however, removing red links is unnecessary. From wiki MOS:

Red links
An internal link that displays in red  points to a page that does not exist by that name. Some red links come about due to errors (misspelling, or failure to check the exact name of the target article); these should be fixed by correcting the spelling, using a piped link or, if appropriate, creating a redirect. However, many red links are perfectly legitimate, serving to point to an article which may exist in the future, and indeed encouraging editors to create such an article. Tttom1 (talk) 03:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Westbury-on-Severn with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — cyber power ( X-Mas Chat )( Contrib. ) 00:13, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Overlinking
Regarding your edits at Triple Cross (1966 film): three of the links you added fall under WP:OVERLINK and one was not to the correct person. Please be more careful with your edits. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:24, 18 December 2011 (UTC)