User talk:20.138.247.64

Remember kids, don't forget to reconsider your attitude towards others - WP:BITE and WP:HOTHEADS especially!

October 2019
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Garry's Mod. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jalen Folf  (talk)  11:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lincoln Towing Service, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. aboideautalk 14:32, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm MarkH21. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Garry's Mod have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Also, please use the edit summaries to accurately describe your edits. — MarkH21 (talk) 10:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Mgasparin (talk) 20:25, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:49, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

To reviewing admins, note that the above request is the first unblock request for the new block (the extended block) which I just put in place. Normally after this many unblock requests, talk page access would be revoked for the duration of the block. I urge patience here, given that this is the first request for the new block. --Yamla (talk) 10:51, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi - to be clear, I am appealing both the original block - for repeatedly adding unsourced content, when in my later edits (which removed the disputed 'TnB' content) I hadn't done any wrong - and the extended block - given when I questioned why I had been blocked, when similar edits/content in other articles were not disputed.20.138.247.64 (talk) 11:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeap. My comment was just to urge the reviewing administrator to leave your access to your talk page intact, while it would normally be removed at this point. :) --Yamla (talk) 11:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I'd appreciate if my TPA still wasn't removed going forward, whatever the result. Cheers.20.138.247.64 (talk) 11:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The most important things you could do would be to explain what you should do when your edits are disputed and explain when content needs to be cited(WP:CITE). Please review the links you've been given. 331dot (talk) 11:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm still not following you though - here, let me show you what I'm trying to ask. This is the edit that I dispute - what is the issue here, with the game modes I have mentioned? If you look at any other video game article, for instance - Kane & Lynch there is a section which references the Fragile Alliance multiplayer gamemode, that does not include separate sources for it.20.138.247.64 (talk) 11:32, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The main issue is, what do you when others dispute your edits?(leaving the merits of the actual edits aside for the moment) 331dot (talk) 11:39, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Justify the edits? The block states it was applied for providing unsourced content, what I am disputing here is that I do not feel this content fell short of the criteria.20.138.247.64 (talk) 11:43, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Justify them how, to who, and where? 331dot (talk) 11:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Justify the edits to whoever has an issue with them; state why you're disputing their view and including the content, either in the edit or on their talk/the article's talk page. Except, in this case, I was blocked for 'unsourced/poorly sourced content' when this wasn't the case, in the end. I acted and reverted the initial offending segment.20.138.247.64 (talk) 11:58, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I will just say as well, I did try this; here.20.138.247.64 (talk) 12:19, 11 October 2019 (UTC)