User talk:200.133.1.60

February 2023
Hello, I'm Nick Levine. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Auto mechanic have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Nick Levine (talk) 15:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Radiographer. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Nick Levine (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Auto mechanic, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. ... disco spinster   talk  16:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Radiographer. Nick Levine (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)


 * , what's wrong with the source?. 200.133.1.60 (talk) 16:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Promotion of an external site is not the same thing as providing a neutral source. All your edits today have promoted www.careermatch.com. Nick Levine (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Edit Warring Warning.
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ApLundell (talk) 00:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)