User talk:200.175.61.43

Democracy-Dictatorship Index
Please stop adding your personal opinion to the article. It is currently based on reliable sources. Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but your sources are no reliable if they say Venezuela is a democracy:
 * https://theconversation.com/venezuela-is-now-a-dictatorship-96960
 * https://www.lawfareblog.com/constitutional-path-dictatorship-venezuela
 * https://www.vox.com/world/2017/9/19/16189742/venezuela-maduro-dictator-chavez-collapse
 * https://law.stanford.edu/2019/03/20/the-constitutional-path-to-dictatorship-in-venezuela/ 200.175.61.43 (talk) 13:06, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Democracy-Dictatorship Index. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please note that the talk page is for building consensus by convincing other editors your position is the better one, not for announcing a determination to continue edit warring by writing things like I will keep editing the Venezuela classification until it stays as it should. That's a textbook example of edit warring. Egsan Bacon (talk) 15:42, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * When something is complety wrong, it needs to be corrected, Venezuela is a dictatorship, there is no debate or convincing about it, there is more than enough sources backing that up, here they are just some of the sources:
 * https://theconversation.com/venezuela-is-now-a-dictatorship-96960
 * https://www.lawfareblog.com/constitutional-path-dictatorship-venezuela
 * https://www.vox.com/world/2017/9/19/16189742/venezuela-maduro-dictator-chavez-collapse
 * https://law.stanford.edu/2019/03/20/the-constitutional-path-to-dictatorship-in-venezuela/
 * This is not my personal opinion, its a consensus, keeping the false information that Venezuela is a democracy contradicts even a article from Wikipedia itself:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_freedom_indices
 * Note that in the graph, Venezuela appears as a authoritarian regime by 2021 Democracy Index. 200.175.61.43 (talk) 18:05, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm Wesoree. I noticed that you recently removed content from Democracy-Dictatorship Index without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wesoree (Talk) 18:14, 6 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I partially blocked the IP from editing this page for a year.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Giorgia Meloni. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Giorgia Meloni, you may be blocked from editing. dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Giorgia Meloni. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I've now added Giorgia Meloni to the partial block. If the disruption extends to any more articles, the block will likely be modified to site wide. -- Ponyo bons mots 19:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)