User talk:200188449a

Speedy deletion nomination of Anthony Delgado
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Anthony Delgado, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. 66.57.4.150 (talk) 19:58, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I have also deleted the versions of this article on this talk page and at your user page, because the content does not serve to improve Wikipedia in any way whatsoever and can be considered vandalism. -- Kinu t /c  20:39, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:267800BeatriceRosenmd.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:267800BeatriceRosenmd.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:267800BeatriceRosenmd.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:267800BeatriceRosenmd.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 02:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Likewise, your edits to Aaliyah were reverted. The picture you uploaded is under copyright, and we cannot use copyrighted pictures in the infobox. —C.Fred (talk) 20:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Aaliyah.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Aaliyah.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:16, 5 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ xplicit  01:16, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

April 2010
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Aaliyah. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — ξ xplicit  22:11, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Catalina Island, Dominican Republic. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 22:13, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —C.Fred (talk) 22:21, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 31 hours, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 22:28, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Aaliyah. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — ξ xplicit  00:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for continued disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu  00:38, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Aaliyah, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — ξ xplicit  23:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked for one month from editing for continued disruptive editing yet again. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — ξ xplicit  23:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)