User talk:2001:171B:227E:3CF0:35B9:C83B:4EA7:D57B

Hello, can someone tell me why this was not accepted? Thank you.
 * Yes. You need to demonstrate that the proposed subject meets or at least is likely WP:GNG. I.e., that there is significant (not routine) coverage in multiple (more than one) reliable (not random fan websites or blogs) and independent (i.e. sources which do not involve a significant contribution from the subject itself) sources. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:04, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation. I was under the impression that discogs.com is neither a fan site, nor a blog... Rather something akin to Wikipedia itself - namely a peer reviewed compendium of public knowledge? I included it to illustrate notoriety. Also, my apologies for apparently being unable to format this message properly. This is also why I've requested someone more knowledgeable create the article.
 * Just so you know, putting too many links isn't much better... WP:THREE might be the best tip here - if you're unsure, put the three best sources, don't put a dozen - that just makes it harder for volunteers who might want to create some of these articles to go through them. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)