User talk:2001:1C04:3B11:DD00:EDEC:2E3:643A:B857

Copyright violation
You made an edit to Revision as of 14:01, 14 February 2021 to the Wikipedia article Minor campaigns of 1815.

There is a high probability it was copied and translated from The Netherlands Reserve Army, 1815 (archive 2020-08-11). (see Earwig's Copyvio Detector)

Please read breach of copyright (see Wikipedia Copyright Violation Policy. Now you are aware of it, if you breach that policy you can expect to be blocked.

It may be that that page is a copy of the original text, if so it is plagiarism because you did not follow the guidance in WP:SAYWHEREYOUREADIT. How to avoid accusations of plagiarism can be found in the guideline WP:PLAGIARISM. If the text was not copied from there but from the sources that both you and the author of the napoleon-series page cites, then that too is plagiarism (see WP:FREECOPYING—part of the plagiarism guideline).

-- PBS (talk) 11:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

In-text attribution
With Revision as of 02:59, 31 July 2021 of the Wikipedia article Minor campaigns of 1815 you broke the In-text attribution guidence.

See Revision as of 10:12, 8 October 2021 where I put back the sources deleted by that edit before the text if the new edit. Basically if you insert text between the start of text covered by an inline citation and the citation, then you need to insert the old inline citations BEFORE the insert, as well as afterwards unless the new source covers all the details. In this case the old citations MUST appear before the inserted text because of the requirements of WP:FREECOPYING (part of the plagiarism guideline).

-- PBS (talk) 11:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)